Ok, so this is from my Special Education course materials. Credit is given at the beginning of this article.
Is it me or has this method of teaching discipline been used for all students regardless of ability?
GC
quarterly newsletter from the
Canadian Council for Exceptional
Children, Winter ’97
If you teach exceptional children, then beware of today’s popular discipline. It relies on strategies that are the exact opposite of the way your students learn. The more you use these strategies, the less likely it is that your students will become responsible and cooperative. In fact, they are far more likely to become manipulative and non-compliant. In addition, many of them will underachieve, falling far below their true potential.
For rewards and consequences to work, children must recall what has happened to them in various situations and use that knowledge to alter their behaviour when the situation reoccurs. They have to decide if their choices were successful. Did they take the rights and needs of others into account? Would they do the same thing again or choose a different course of action? Clearly, children with learning disabilities or intellectual impairments would be hard pressed to respond appropriately.
If this is difficult for exceptional children in general, it is virtually impossible for impulsive children. Impulsive children, especially those severe enough t warrant the A.D.D. (Attention Deficit Disorder) label, act before they think. In other words, the moment their brains go into gear, impulsivity governs their thinking patterns and they mess up. These children are at risk in a think-for yourself world because, by definition, thinking is their problem, wonder A.D.D. children seem to be ‘coming out of the woodwork ‘ these days. For impulsive child: to succeed, they need more structure and routine so they can focus their thinking and do it in short ‘chunks’. They also require me adult direction and supervision than is provided by behaviour management.
Picasso Would Be Proud
Perhaps Picasso could handle the abstract nature of today’s discipline but many exceptional children can’t. They are handicapped by the complete lack of a teaching component in-behaviour management. There are behavioural skills which children must learn, including cooperation, responsibility, conflict resolution, and courtesy. Behaviour management assumes that children will learn these skills from personal experience, from the outcomes of their choices. As we know, however, many exceptional children do not learn this way. They require direct instruction along with positive practice and constant review.Many teachers have become so concerned about this missing element that they have implemented social skills programs in their classrooms. Unfortunately, these programs are time consuming and have limited impact. Most teachers would clearly prefer to teach the skills within ordinary, everyday interactions between themselves and children. That approach, unfortunately, is not supported by today’s discipline.
The Achilles’ heel of the reward and consequence system is that it only works if children care about the rewards and consequences. Many children learn to defeat the system by developing an immunity to consequences. “Send me to the office. I don’t care”. We hear those “I don’t care” words all the time. Children with behavioural exceptionalities are often well endowed with this attitude. It is one of the manipulative traits that they acquire as a means of getting their own way.
But these are just the children who acquire an immunity to consequences. What are we going to do about all the children who have a natural immunity because of all the pain and turmoil in their lives? Many of our exceptional children come from these situations. Maybe they’re neglected, or their family is breaking up, or their parents drink and fight. Add poverty and frequent relocation. The list goes on and on. Discipline fails these children because it relies on them to do something that they are incapable of doing. It relies on them to care.
One Comment
This is amusing. 12 years ago the author suggests an approach to discipline that must come from the experience of adults and he notes that children with ld cannot make those correct choices.
Today, my school pushes “differentiated instruction” for all courses but we still use the loosey-goosey hit and miss apporach to discipline. When I questioned my principal he stated that the approach to discipline “must be flexible for all children.” I questioned this approach since the ld students got the “what can I get away with approach” and have no understanding of the application of consequences to their behaviour. The rest of the class don’t have the life experiences to make correct “choices” in their lives. As such, we have students who don’t understand boundaries in their lives and display feelings of hurt and frustration since “it’s allowed at home behaviour” in class.
Why isn’t there differentiated discipline?